Skip to main content

Firefighters ratify 2.75 percent pay hike

December 25, 2010

WOONSOCKET – The city firefighters union has unanimously agreed to accept a 2.75 percent, retroactive pay hike for the fiscal year that began on July 1 – now it's up to the City Council to approve the pact.
The proposal would end an arbitration dispute with roots that go back to a multi-year contract ironed out in 2009, during a particularly turbulent period in relations between the city and Local 732 of the International Association of Fire Fighters.
Facing an unprecedented rollback in state aid, the city closed the Fairmount Street fire station, eliminated the positions of nine firefighters and froze the wages of firefighters to save money. The firefighters bought in, in part, because the pact called for a wage reopener during the current fiscal year, with an increase somewhere between 2.75 and 4.75 percent.
Still wrestling with a projected municipal budget gap in excess of $1 million this fiscal year, Mayor Leo T. Fontaine hedged when it came time for the reopener to kick in on July 1. After informing the IAFF that he would offer no wage increase despite the previously agreed-upon reopener clause, the IAFF responded by filing for arbitration.
Fire Lt. Christopher Oakland, president of the IAFF, said union members welcome the opportunity to put the arbitration dispute behind them. After two years without a raise, reduced manpower and a continued escalation in demand for services, Oakland says, firefighters deserve a break.
“We didn't get a penny raise in the last two years,” he says. “We're working with fewer firefighters and less equipment. The number of runs hasn't decreased, so we're doing more work with less equipment and personnel.”
Firefighters aren't just working harder, says Oakland, they're working smarter and more efficiently. For the first time this fall, he said, firefighters began using sophisticated new equipment and techniques to to assist patients with severe breathing problems, heart attack and other life-threatening medical conditions.
The deal needs the City Council's endorsement before it can take effect as planned next month, and the panel was expected to vote last night after a briefing from the mayor.
Fontaine said earlier this week the deal doesn't provide the concessions the administration needs from the union to close the projected budget gap – it doesn't even come close. But Fontaine says it's still a better deal than the city is likely to achieve had it allowed a settlement on the reopener dispute to be ironed out in arbitration.
It's a fair assumption that an arbitration panel would have chosen a figure somewhere in the middle of the high and low percentage increases allowed in the reopener clause, Fontaine reasons. Even if an arbitration panel had chosen to apply the average of the two figures, or 3.75 percent, the city would still be on the hook for an additional percentage worth of wages.
“In an effort to try to prevent an arbitration panel from giving them more we tried to give them a minimal amount within a payment structure that's flexible and doesn't place an undue burden on the city,” Fontaine said.
By the end of the fiscal year, the increase will translate into about $250,000 worth of additional payroll costs for the IAFF, the mayor said.
The hike is retroactive to July 1. If all goes according to plan, firefighters will see a raise in their paychecks after January, covering the last six months of the fiscal year. The city will make a retroactive payout to firefighters covering the first six months of the fiscal year sometime in April, according to Fontaine.
The city began the fiscal year with a projected $1.5 million shortfall that Fontaine hoped to eliminate with an assortment of payroll concessions from various city labor unions. Fontaine has gotten most of what he wanted, including higher health care co-pays, job cuts, furlough days and other concessions, from other unions.
Fontaine says he still wants another $1.1 million worth of concessions from firefighters before the end of the fiscal year, but he isn't saying just yet how he plans on achieving that target.
“We're still hopeful and we'll continue to work with them,” says Fontaine.

Comments

Private Ambulances

January 20, 2011 by JPTaxpayer (not verified), 3 years 26 weeks ago
Comment: 169

I heard the mayor this morning say they were looking into many options to cut cost and one of them maybe private ambulances. I say FINALLY. If for no other reason than the fact that we won't have to listen to how many calls they have to go on now with less people working.

Tired of it

January 7, 2011 by JPTaxpayer (not verified), 3 years 28 weeks ago
Comment: 159

I am sick and tired of the firefighters union and their constant fleecing of the City of Woonsocket. Everytime you turn around they are holding us hostage for more pay or they're fighting manpower cuts. It's criminal what they're doing to the taxpayers in this city. I'm outraged and I can't believe more citizens aren't.

Firefighter's risk

December 29, 2010 by relish (not verified), 3 years 29 weeks ago
Comment: 148

Granted we are in an economy that does not warrent increases. However, public saftey should be never be compromised especially during theses tough economic times since there are more people stressed about job losses and such that has nade citizens react differently and does affect all aspects of there health and general thought proceses. Both Police and Fire calls have increaded and they put there life on the line every day for the taxpayers of the city. Yes the Police go for coffee and the Firepeople go for food and in an instant the Fire side could be fighting a fire and the Police could be fighting a criminal perhaps with a wepon / or not and the economic climate certainly leads to stress which produces health problems therefore more Rescue calls. They put their lives and the effect of that on their families every hour of every day. If you haven't used the service of either you are not aware of the training and dedication of these men and woman. Trust me ...they are your lifeline not only to you but to your loved ones.

This seems awfully unfair

December 27, 2010 by Bunny (not verified), 3 years 29 weeks ago
Comment: 145

This seems awfully unfair when other city workers have been dealing with retroactive health care co-pay increases, forced furlough days, and no pay increases for the past five years.

BooHoo for you

December 25, 2010 by dlnetvaroha (not verified), 3 years 30 weeks ago
Comment: 143

Guess what? We ALL work hard, have more duties, lost coworkers, and our taxes cannot go down, NONE of us had raises in YEARS. Welcome to the sucky economy in RI. The fire fighters think their situation is so very different? How about the Tim Horton workers who have NO jobs now? How about the teachers who are laid off this year? Our kids have minimal education, our services are minimal. I wish i could have expensive lawyers step in and make my boss give me a raise. This is the real world people, sometimes things change. I 100% agree they deserve a raise. We ALL do. But we need to be responsible and think about the good of the whole city.

CUMBERLAND -- Although Frank Geiselman has officially retired from Cumberland High School...
CUMBERLAND — Even dating back to last summer, skipper Dave Belisle had a feeling his...
  BRISTOL  –  Sean Meers clubbed two homers, drove in five runs and scored...
launched a new mass emergency notification system designed to alert residents of public safety threats, parking bans,...
WOONSOCKET – A move to punt City Council President Albert G. Brien from his leadership role on the panel ended...
NORTH SMITHFIELD — When the military funeral is over, families of soldiers killed in the service of their country can...

 

Premium Drupal Themes by Adaptivethemes