Skip to main content

Mayor wins surprising showdown over rollback of firefighting equipment

January 29, 2011

WOONSOCKET – Despite the efforts of the firefighters union to block the move in Superior Court, a new effort by Mayor Leo T. Fontaine to rein in overtime at the fire department by scaling back the amount of firefighting apparatus will go into effect as planned tomorrow.
The showdown had been quietly simmering between the administration and Local 732 of the International Association of Fire Fighters all week. It began Monday when Fontaine ordered the Woonsocket Fire Department to remove one of the city's two aerial trucks from service whenever manpower levels fall below 26 firefighters per shift, a figure that would ordinarily trigger call-in firefighters for overtime.
The IAFF challenged the order in Superior Court yesterday, arguing that it violates the minimum manning guarantees of its collective bargaining agreement and puts firefighters and the general public at increased risk of injury and property damage. The union sought a preliminary order blocking Fontaine from following through, but Associate Judge Walter Stone refused to interfere – at least for now.
The judge said he wants to hold a full-blown hearing on the dispute, but none is scheduled. Fontaine's order is now slated to take effect at 8 a.m. tomorrow.
“The news is the mayor is going to violate our contract by reducing our minimum manning,” said Lt. Chris Oakland, president of the IAFF. “It's not only a violation of collective bargaining, but also jeopardizes safety. You can't operate as efficiently or effectively with 23 firefighters as you can with 26.”
The mayor's plan pivots around a staffing concept known as a shift complement – the minimum number of firefighters that must be on duty before the department is required to call in supplemental help on overtime. The current minimum is 26, but the department often fails to meet the standard because of vacations, illnesses, injuries or other reasons.
Instead of calling in help for overtime whenever staffing dips below 26, Fontaine wants to sideline one of the department's two ladder trucks. By contract, the fire department must dedicate three firefighters per aerial, but those workers would be freed up to work at regular time under Fontaine's order.
Fontaine recognizes that the contract prohibits the city from unilaterally reducing the shift complement to 23 workers – which is precisely what the union contends he is about to do. But he says the City Charter gives him “management rights” to determine how much firefighting apparatus should be in service at any given time, just as he has the authority to decide whether his secretary's office needs a new desk or an air conditioner.
Fontaine said he issued the order only after repeated attempts to negotiate contractual concessions with the IAFF to help close a looming budget deficit failed. Fontaine said the IAFF is the only city employees union so far that hasn't provided concessions he sought to help close a $2.5 million budget gap before the end of the fiscal year.
“We're in the middle of a financial crisis and we have made no secret our of attempts to reach financial concessions and the need to take action in the absence of that,” the mayor said. “We went to extraordinary lengths to give the firefighters options that would create long-term structural savings that the city needs to rebuild its financial health.”
Fontaine estimates that sidelining an aerial under the conditions he's outlined will save $250,000 in overtime by June 30 – less than 25 percent of the savings he says he really needs from the fire department.
As for the public safety arguments the union raises, Fontaine says the need for two ladders in service at all times has been wildly exaggerated. In 2009, the last year for which a complete 12-month cycle of statistics was available, Ladder 1 – the truck he wants to sideline – was dispatched 1,199 times. Only 21 of those occasions involved a house or some other structure that was on fire.
On average, said Fontaine, the truck was pressed into service once every 7.5 hours for incidents that included cooking fires (18), backup for rescue squads (139), motor vehicle accidents (127) and false alarms (640 times).
But Oakland says the statistics don't tell the whole story. Aerial trucks carry much of the same equipment as a rescue squad and they're often dispatched to a variety of medical emergencies, from car accidents to reports of carbon monoxide poisoning, because rescue squads may be unable to reach the victims as quickly as one of the ladder trucks.
“They're rolling for whatever incident a citizen perceives to be a true emergency,” he says.
Chief Gary Lataille was sympathetic to the union's concerns, saying the loss of staff does not make residents or firefighters safer. But Lataille said he recognizes the city is in a fiscal crisis and he intends to honor the mayor's instructions.
“I will run the fire department under the guidance the mayor tells me to,” said Lataille. “If he tells me to run it with 15 people, I'll run the best fire department I can with 15 people.”
With a budget of roughly $10 million, the fire department spent over $1 million for overtime last fiscal year, according to Lataille. If the mayor's order stands, the chief said he is confident the city will reap substantial savings as a result.
Of the 42 work shifts that elapsed between Jan. 2 and Jan 22, Lataille said staffing fell below the minimum shift complement for 30 of them, requiring the city to call in at least one firefighter to pick up the slack on overtime.
This is the second major clash between the city and the firefighters union in two years in which minimum manning has emerged as a bump on the road to cuts in public safety costs. Former Mayor Susan D. Menard and the IAFF spent several days in Superior Court in 2009 before she won the right to lay off 11 firefighters. They were eventually recalled, but the union later ironed out a new contract that saw the permanent elimination of eight position and the closure of the Fairmount Street Fire Station, shrinking the department from 132 to 124 members.
But Fontaine says the fire department is one of the few places left to find the substantial cuts the city needs to stay solvent and avoid a state takeover of its finances. The state is currently monitoring the financial activities of the city, including plans to float a $12 million bond to wipe out accumulated deficits, the linchpin of the city's strategy for remaining operationally solvent into the foreseeable future.
“If we can't find structural savings in the fire department going forward, it might mean the difference between falling under state control – or not,” said Fontaine.


Public safety is paramount

February 15, 2011 by Suzie10 (not verified), 4 years 33 weeks ago
Comment: 213

Public safety is paramount and we can make savings in other areas than the latter. One can also note the same thing for education, which is the basis of the reduction between the rich and less rich!

Ce jeu dans ce casino en ligne est fantastique.

I think most of the people

February 9, 2011 by GlenRemy (not verified), 4 years 34 weeks ago
Comment: 209

I think most of the people here are unaware of exactly how dangerous it is that this city is decreasing public safety. Why is it that we are looking to put this whole budget deficit on the backs of our Police and Firemen? I see wasted money in many more areas in this city. What about City Hall? Can we not cut positions there? What makes people sitting in those offices, making large salaries (that us tax payers afford them) so important that they can't be cut or receive a pay decrease? Just drive around and look for wasted tax dollars. It's everywhere and in everything Woonsocket usually does. As a resident and tax payer, I'm not for risking my family or property by reducing anything in public safety! Be it less equipment, policemen or firemen. I'm sure there is good reason for the policies and proceedures they all have. And by cutting anything, equipment or people, I'm also sure they cannot do their jobs efficiently and effectively. How much more crime can we allow and how many more homes will we lose? How can we be comfortable with the dangerous changes and direction this city is leading us all into?

answer this topic

January 31, 2011 by BlanchardBethany (not verified), 4 years 36 weeks ago
Comment: 190

If you want to buy real estate, you would have to get the loans. Furthermore, my sister always utilizes a auto loan, which occurs to be really reliable.

Fontaine is a idiot, nuff said!

January 31, 2011 by Jeffo46 (not verified), 4 years 36 weeks ago
Comment: 189

What if something major ever does happen and the Fire department isn't well equipped because of Fontaine's boneheaded move? Leo, you need to think before you do stubts like this. And why I'm at it, you griped a couple of weeks ago that the city couldn't afford to have the sidewalks shoveled or have the excess snow removed? Well Brainiac, I have a couple of solutions for you; contact Chaffee and ask him to put together some chain gangs from the ACI to come here and shovel our sidewalks since the highway dept refuses to do their job, and concerning where to dump the extra snow? We have plenty of parks here in Woonsocket along with Barry field where your workers can plop the snow and watch it melt until spring!

Fire Dept

January 30, 2011 by observer (not verified), 4 years 36 weeks ago
Comment: 187

Congratulation on your display of testosterone. Enough people out of work and they sit in such a plum job get rid of them if they are not satisfied. Unions only enhance incompetency and lack of motivation. Probably the next move like it or not is to combine them with quasi duties of the police dept. That should frost their cake. Then they would have to work for a living and not be a culinary expert. A City the size of Woonsocket should have a combination public safety department. They are no more at risk of loosing their life than the loggers working in the woods.

Mayor and Firefighters

January 29, 2011 by slearn863 (not verified), 4 years 36 weeks ago
Comment: 183

"Fontaine recognizes that the contract prohibits the city from unilaterally reducing the shift complement to 23 workers – which is precisely what the union contends he is about to do. But he says the City Charter gives him “management rights” to determine how much firefighting apparatus should be in service at any given time, just as he has the authority to decide whether his secretary's office needs a new desk or an air conditioner" The mayor is comparing saving lives and property to his secretary's desk? Too many people, including those who think they know what the city needs, take firefighters for granted. Please re-think this frivilous decision.

NORTH SMITHFIELD — It was obvious North Smithfield High head coach Laurie Puddester would...
CUMBERLAND – People like Alan Tenreiro and Adolfo Costa are doers and men of swift action...
A little of this, a little of that … Of all the members of the Red Sox baseball staff in...
NORTH SMITHFIELD – When you lose a veteran principal between school years it helps to have someone with local...
WOONSOCKET – It was wet and rainy at the Autumnfest grounds in World War II Veterans Memorial State Park...
WOONSOCKET – When you walk around the Stadium Theatre it is easy to get a feeling of time standing still in a...


Premium Drupal Themes by Adaptivethemes